http://duncanriley.disqus.com/enTue, 18 Jan 2011 20:08:06 -0000http://www.duncanriley.com/nbn-by-the-numbers/#comment-130991801<p>Keep your mind,my friend.</p>best camcorderTue, 18 Jan 2011 20:08:06 -0000http://www.duncanriley.com/nbn-by-the-numbers/#comment-130423326<p>There may be another way to solve it.</p>electronicTue, 18 Jan 2011 04:06:19 -0000http://www.duncanriley.com/nbn-by-the-numbers/#comment-61854496<p>Wow!it is really a nice list of NBN by the numbers on this post.....</p>c++ faqsTue, 13 Jul 2010 07:19:03 -0000http://www.duncanriley.com/nbn-by-the-numbers/#comment-33331315<p> The "market" simply isn't interested in serving people who live in areas that aren't profitable for them. </p>Satellite TVTue, 09 Feb 2010 19:25:45 -0000http://www.duncanriley.com/nbn-by-the-numbers/#comment-7933320<p>So what's your beef -- is it that this is a public endeavor and not a private one or is it that it costs too much and it will take too long?</p><p>I'm sympathetic on the second point, but on the first point: get over it. The "market" simply isn't interested in serving people who live in areas that aren't profitable for them. Stop being such an ideologue.<br></p>RowanTue, 07 Apr 2009 05:38:20 -0000http://www.duncanriley.com/nbn-by-the-numbers/#comment-7932066<p>You calculate the number of homes in Australia, how about calculating the number of homes in America. You can not honestly call this article by the NUMBERS with such an obvious bias. Come on WAKE UP!</p>noneTue, 07 Apr 2009 03:34:11 -0000